The Political Thought of Karl Popper by Jeremy
نویسندگان
چکیده
A nyone who reads Jeremy Shearmur’s book will be struck by the degree to which Popper’s vast output is an integrated work. In particular, Popper’s political thought is closely connected with his explanation of science. One of Popper’s more impressive achievements was to expose the authoritarian element in the Western intellectual tradition. For instance, traditional theories of knowledge address the question: what is the source of true belief? They assert that a theory cannot be accepted as genuine unless it can be positively justified, that is, proven true. They only identify knowledge with certain knowledge, thereby demanding very high epistemological standards. Traditional theories of knowledge recognise different foundations of knowledge but they all share the feature that some unquestionable authority must be appealed to in order to legitimise our beliefs—whether that authority is the power of the intellect (in the case of Descartes and Spinoza), the evidence of the senses (logical positivism) or some other source. A similar authoritarian bias permeates the traditional conception of politics. The fundamental problem that has engaged political thinkers, from Plato to Marx, has been the question: who should rule the state? Plato’s answer was simply ‘the best’ should rule, and possibly ‘the best few—the aristocrats’, but certainly not the many, the people. For Marx it was ‘the workers’ who should rule rather than ‘the capitalists’ (Popper, 1988, pp. 23–24). Popper developed an approach to knowledge and to politics which was free of authoritarian assumptions. As for his theory of knowledge, Popper argues that we learn from our mistakes, by trial and the elimination of error. He applied this simple idea to science and to politics. According to Popper, all our beliefs are guesses about the world, mere conjectures. What is distinctive about science is that we seek systematically to make our theories open to interpersonal criticism and empirical testing, with a view to discovering our mistakes as soon as possible:
منابع مشابه
Karl Popper – Introduction Sir
Popper commanded international audiences and conversation with him was an intellectual adventure even if a little rough animated by a myriad of philosophical problems. His intense desire to tear away at the veneer of falsity in pursuit of the truth lead him to contribute to a field of thought encompassing (among others) political theory, quantum mechanics, logic, scientific method and evolution...
متن کاملPopper Reference : Thornton , Stephen , 2005 : “ Karl Popper ” . In “ The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy ”
Karl Popper is generally regarded as one of the greatest philosophers of science of the 20th century. He was also a social and political philosopher of considerable stature, a self-professed ‘critical-rationalist’, a dedicated opponent of all forms of scepticism, conventionalism, and relativism in science and in human affairs generally, a committed advocate and staunch defender of the ‘Open Soc...
متن کامل“ The most philosophically of all the sciences ” : Karl Popper and physical cosmology
Problems of scientific cosmology only rarely occur in the works of Karl Popper, the famous Austrian-British philosopher. Nevertheless, it was a subject that interested him and which he occasionally commented on. What is more important, his general claim of falsifiability as a criterion that demarcates science from non-science has played a significant role in periods of the development of modern...
متن کاملThe Concept of “Political Legitimacy” in Shia Political Thought (With Focus on Imam Khomeini’s Political Thought)
Legitimacy is always considered an important concept among basic topics of political science; since it has been already posed as the prerequisite of acceptability for exercising of power in the societies through history. Accordingly, all of the political philosophies made efforts to establish an intellectual apparatus that enforces the fundamentals of governance, dealt to some extent with the i...
متن کاملMachiavelli and the Foundation of the Modern Political Thought
The present article intends to start introduction to the political thinking of Machiavelli by passing through some key concepts in his thinking, and by placing his idea in the area of political thinking. Surveying ethics in Machiavelli’s political thinking needs separate individual ethics from political (civil) one. And explaining Machiavelli’s remarks about the category of ethics...
متن کامل